A journal that narrates every step to “Readings and Project Work for Teaching Literature in ESL Context”

Thursday, August 19, 2010

Akeelah and the Bee

19th August 2010 (Thursday)






This is one enjoyable movie that worth watching again and again. Basically, “Akeelah and the Bee” narrates about an 11-year-old girl who excels in her spelling, which leads her to participate in the Scripps National Spelling Bee. The whole story reflects how her courage, confidence and hard work win her the competition. Besides, the movie also explores issues of education in the black community.

Through the movie, I got a few teaching implications which are listed as below:

1. Always motivate your students with inspiring quotes, stories or even talk.

Akeelah: [quoting Marianne Williamson]

Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. We ask ourselves, Who am I to be brilliant, gorgeous, talented, fabulous? Actually, who are you not to be? We were born to make manifest the glory of God that is within us. And as we let our own light shine, we unconsciously give other people permission to do the same.

Dr. Larabee: Does that mean anything to you?

Akeelah: I don't know.

Dr. Larabee: It's written in plain English. What does it mean?

Akeelah: That I'm not supposed to be afraid?

Dr. Larabee: Afraid of what?

Akeelah: Afraid of... me?

2. Help students to believe in themselves.

3. Push students to reach their potentials

Note: Though I don’t really agree upon Mr. Welch’s intention in forcing students to win competition for school fund. He somehow did help Akeelah to realize her dreams and refine her potential.

Mr. Welch: So whoever wins the school bee today, gets to represent Crenshaw at the district bee next month.

Akeelah: Why would anybody want to represent a school where they can't even put doors on the toilet stalls?

Mr. Welch: Akeelah, if we can't show students can perform were not going to have money for books let alone bathroom doors. Now I want you to do the bee today, okay?

Akeelah: So everyone can call me a freak and a brainiac? No I ain't down for no spelling bee.

Mr. Welch: Well, maybe you'd be down for spending the rest of the semester in detention for all your absences?

4. Find students’ learning style and adapt it to the lesson

For example, Akeelah can spell better by skipping rope.

5. Understand students behaviour more through Their Parents and Peers

For instance, Akeelah rejects the spelling bee contest, feeling that her friends will laugh at her for being a nerd. Besides, her mother does not approve her for participating in any competition but put total concentration on her study. Another example would be Dylan. More often than not, he feels stressed and depressed because of his domineering father, who gives high expectation to his son and forces his son to work hard to be the champion.


Many students these days are like Dylan. They had to cope with parents’ expectations and are forced to study or go for tuition. How would teachers deal with them?




Friday, August 13, 2010

The Story of a Remarkable Teacher – Ron Clark

12th August 2010 (Thursday)


Movie, like picture, tells a thousand words. Today, another inspiring movie had been shown. It is based on the real-life story of a dedicated teacher, Ron Clark, who moves from a small town to New York City, to teach and inspire disadvantaged students in Harlem. Guess what? The title of the movie is as simple as “The Ron Clark Story”, starring Matthew Perry as Ron Clark.

What is he famous for? According to Wikipedia.com, Ron Clark is known for “his ability to raise test scores by using unique methods that incorporate innovation, creativity and 55 classroom rules”. After watching the movie, I couldn’t help but admire the outstanding teacher who not only managed to discipline the uncontrollable children, but also raised test scores of the weakest students in the school. He could train his students from everyone’s depicted “losers” to high scorers. In fact, they could score higher than any other classes, even the honour class. That is really amazing and unbelievable. But the major question is “How did he do that?”.


From the movie, Ron Clark uses many rules to discipline and teach his students about good values. If he were to teach the educators and future educators, I believe there will be some rules or guidelines too.


After watching the movie, the messages or “rules” that I got from Ron Clark about educating students are as follow:


1. Teach your students to respect and love each other like a family.


It is sort of similar to the idea of Curran’s Community Language Learning , where students form a community in the classroom. Helping each other when in need.


2. Treat your students as your family. Never leave your students, even though they ask you to go to hell.


3. Make an effort to understand your students’ background, behavior and learning styles. It will help a long way to produce an effective teaching and learning process between the teacher and the students.


The first thing Ron Clark did before teaching his students was to understand their backgrounds by visiting their families. Next, he explores their interests, e.g. plays Double Dutch with his students. Last but not the least, he adapts his teaching method with his students’ style and interest, e.g. uses poker cards to teach mathematics to his students.


4. Believe in your students, and they will show you the unbelievable. It’s all about self-fulfilling effect. Here comes the cliché, “If you believe you can fly, you can fly.”


Principal Turner: These kids are at the bottom of the barrel.

Ron Clark: Don't talk about them like that.

Principal Turner: Now all I'm asking is for your students to pass.

Ron Clark: Oh every one of my students will pass.

Principal Turner: They can become someone else's problem.

Ron Clark: The problem isn't the kids. It's not even what they can achieve. The problem is what you expect them to achieve. You are setting the bar here. Why? Set it up here! They can make it.

Principal Turner: This community judges us by scores. Government funding judges us by scores. People who give me scores, they get my respect.

Ron Clark: Okay good. In May, they'll all test at grade level



All in all, Ron Clark is an outstanding teacher who is highly devoted to his job and his students. Hmm….. If only I can learn from him.




Matthew Perry and Ron Clark

Friday, August 6, 2010

Fables and Comics For Teaching

5th August 2010 (Thursday)

Today, we had a group work activity to create fables and present them through comics. It was a fun and interesting activity, as we felt ourselves going back to our childhood days, when most of us would be preoccupied with our colour pencils and drawing.


The teaching implications that are found in this activity are fables and comics can be useful to produce attractive teaching materials. As we were taught in EDU 3209: Literature in English Teaching Materials, an effective, engaging teaching material must be attractive, authentic and has novelty. Next, since most fables end with moral of the stories, teachers can use them to teach moral values. In addition, fables can also be used to teach universal themes in literature classroom, i.e. good versus evil, the power of love, greediness, etc.


Using fables and comics in language classroom is one strategy that worth considering.




Arranged Marriage or Love Marriage?

3rd August 2010 (Tuesday)

“50 to 60 percent of all love marriages in the world end in divorce within the first 2 years. However, only 5 percent of arranged marriages end in divorce. This is because arranged marriages are not made of hormones. They are arranged with care by parents according to compatibility of the bride and groom.”

Manisha Paul (in her article “Arranged Marriage or Love Marriage?”)


Do you agree with the above statement?


Arranged marriage or love marriage? That was the topic of the discussion we were having in the lecture today. Usually, most of us will prefer love of our choice, namely the love marriage. Yet, surprisingly, the divorce rate of love marriage is higher than arranged marriage. So, again, which is better? Arranged marriage or love marriage?


During our group discussion that consists of Priscilla, Sze Leing, Sharon and I, we decided that arranged marriage is better, though we still prefer love marriage. Confused? Well, let’s look it in this way. Between fruits and KFC, which is better for our health? You will be shcouting ‘fruits’. Yet, we prefer eating KFC. Hmm……. That’s our human nature, I guess.


First of all, let us define what arranged marriage and love marriage are. Arranged marriage is a marriage in which the marital partners are chosen by someone based on different considerations other than pre-existing mutual attraction of the partners. It is opposite with love marriage which is arranged by the individuals themselves where the couple get to know each other without introduction from a third-party. Besides being an old custom practiced by royal and aristocratic families around the world, they are still practiced in India, Japan, China, Africa and the Middle East.


In our group discussion, our discussion result was, as compared to love marriage, arranged marriage is better on three aspects: marriage stability, partner selection and family values.


Note:

Inspired by an Indian woman’s saying, Rebecca Livermore (in “The Reality of Arranged Marriages”) explained that arranged marriage is more stable because it is not based on feelings, but on commitment. As the “marriage progresses, the feelings develop”. In America, marriage is based on feelings, but when the feelings wane, so does the marriage, as there is nothing left to keep the marriage together. In other words, arranged marriages are mostly centered around building a family, adjustment between the partners and regard for the wishes of one’s family and religion. Love is believed to grow with time by living together and adjusting to each other’s personality rather than being a product of passionate attraction. Hence, with more commitment to each other and the relationship, more stable marriage is formed. According to Mark Gungor in “Laugh Your Way to a Better Marriage”(2008), romance is a great "salt" to sprinkle on the hard work of sharing a life with another human, but the main ingredient of a happy marriage can never be romance.


Do you agree with that?